My new favorite use case for GPT-4 is to ask it to summarize in the style of. I believe the more open-minded uncertain attitude of Russ is the wiser one for now. So, while it makes a lot of sense to point to clear benefits in a variety of areas which AI will bring, I do not think those more uncertain as to where all this is leading can be cancelled or dismissed so easily. Those who are sounding drastic warnings are not ‘apocalyptic eschatologists’ but people at the forefront of AI development and scientific research in various areas.
There are after all so many possible scenarios almost all of which are not considered and certainly are not ruled out in this conversation.
So, too the impressiveness of Andreesen’s knowledge seems to have an underlying limitation regarding the question of the future effect of AI developments on humanity. Russ also suggests though that there is something a bit single-minded in making Intelligence the single supreme value in understanding what is good for humanity.
As Russ says in the conversation Marc Andreesen is a very smart person.
0 kommentar(er)
